Каждый член жюри проверяет все высл

Каждый член жюри проверяет все высланные работы, производит оценку по критериям и результаты вносит в табличную форму, по которой определяется рейтинг команд. После этого производится расшифровка и определяется победитель и призёры состязания. В течение 3 суток результаты сообщаются командам.
Осуществление проверки по критериям и анализ недостатков.
1. Контроль размеров, точность формы показал, что не все работают с необходимой точностью.
2. Некоторые трудности возникли при чтении чертежа, не все правильно прочли формы объектов.
3. Внесение центровых и нанесение сложных размеров вызвало трудности.
4. Вставка текстовых фрагментов была выполнена только двумя конкурсантами.
5. Вместо проекционного чертежа некоторые команды вставили ассоциативный вид, что не допускается, такие работы не оценивались.
6. В задании на конструирование учащиеся неправильно определяют рёбра и грани, к которым нужно применить операцию (скругление, фаска).
7. Моделирование объектов практически все выполнили правильно.
А.В. Иващенко, куратор образовательной программы АСКОН «Будь инженером», дала высокую оценку заданиям по уровню сложности.

결과 (영어) 1:

Each jury member checks all sent works, evaluates the criteria and makes the results in tabular form, which is determined by the ranking. Then decrypts and determines the winner and prize competitions. Within 3 days the results are communicated to the teams.Verification criteria and analysis of shortcomings.1. Dimensional inspection, the accuracy of the form showed that not all work with the necessary accuracy.2. some difficulties arose when reading a drawing, not all correctly read the shape of objects.3. pivot and complex dimensions caused difficulties.4. Paste text fragments was performed only two participants.5. Instead of the projective drawing some commands inserted an associative type that is not allowed, such works have not been estimated.6. students design job correctly define the edges and faces to which you want to apply an operation (Fillet, chamfer).7. Modeling facilities practically did everything right.A.v. Ivashchenko, curator of the educational program ASCON "engineer", praised jobs by level of difficulty.

결과 (영어) 2:

Each member of the jury checks all deportees work, evaluates according to the criteria and makes the results in tabular form, in which teams are ranked. After that, the transcript and determined the winners of the contest. Within 3 days the results of the team reports.
Implementation of criteria for inspection and analysis of shortcomings.
1. Control the size, shape accuracy has shown that not all work with the required accuracy.
2. Some difficulties arose during the reading of the drawing, not all correctly read the shapes of objects.
3. Adding to pivot and applying complex dimensions caused difficulties.
4. Insert text fragments was performed only two contestants.
5. Instead of the projection drawing some commands insert an associative view that is not allowed, such work is not valued.
6. The specification for the construction of the students correctly identify edges and faces to which you want to apply the operation (rounding, chamfer).
7. Simulation of almost all objects correctly.
AV Ivashchenko, curator of the educational program ASCON "Be an engineer," praised by the level of complexity of tasks.

결과 (영어) 3:

each member of the panel checks the work, assessing criteria and the results of its табличную shape, which is determined by the ranking.after that, by deciphering and defines the winner and winners of the competition. for three days the results be communicated commands.
verification criteria and analysis shortcomings.
1. control sizethe accuracy of the form showed that not all work with the necessary precision.
2. some difficulties were encountered in reading, drawing, not correctly read the form objects.
3.the центровых and the complex size caused difficulties.
4. box text fragments was accomplished with only two contestants.
5.instead of projection drawing some commands have an associative type that is not allowed, such work is not evaluated.
6. the assignment to design students wrong define ribs and edge.we should apply the operation (скругление, chamfer).
7. the simulation of virtually all fulfilled right.
a. r. the educational program аскон "be инженером»,commended the assignments on the level of complexity.