Реформирование технологического обр

Реформирование технологического образования школьников сегодня активно обсуждается педагогами и другими специалистами, прямо или косвенно связанными с этим направлением общего образования. Основной темой весьма жестких дискуссий является содержание предметной области «Технология». Наиболее радикальные реформаторы называют своих оппонентов - приверженцев эволюционных изменений содержания предмета - уничижительно «партией борща и напильника», подразумевая, что их позиции безнадежно устарели и не соответствует вызовам XXI века.

결과 (영어) 1:

Reform of technological education of schoolchildren today actively discussed by teachers and other professionals directly or indirectly related to this area of general education. The main topic of discussions is very stringent subject area content "technology". The most radical Reformers call his opponents were adherents of evolutionary changes of the content of the subject-pejoratively "Borsch party and file", implying that their positions are hopelessly outdated and does not correspond to the challenges of the twenty-first century.

결과 (영어) 2:

Reforming Technology education students today is actively discussed by teachers and other professionals directly or indirectly associated with this trend of general education. "Technology" The main topic of discussion is a very hard domain content. The most radical reformers called his opponents - the adherents of evolutionary changes of the subject content - pejoratively "party of borscht and a file", meaning that their positions are hopelessly outdated and does not meet the challenges of the XXI century.

결과 (영어) 3:

the reform of technology education students today actively debated educators and other professionals, directly or indirectly related to the direction of the general education. the main topic of discussion is the very stringent subject field "technology. the most radical reformers call their opponents from evolutionary changes of subject - a pejorative "party of borscht and напильника», implying that their positions are hopelessly outdated and does not meet the challenges of the twenty-first century.